Friday, September 09, 2005

untitled

Well, today is a pretty good day, I can't say "good" because 1) the days not over yet and 2) yesterday was a "good" and there's some rule about having two "good" days in a row.

(just to let you know, I had already typed something up, punched the publish buttom, but, lo and behold...blogger was under a "temporary maintenance" or some jabber like that, so I'm trying to retype it 2 1/2 hours after the fact. I had a meeting for work.)

((side-side note: "jabber" is a neat word))

cont.
You know when you haven't seen a person for a long time and when together you most always had a really good time, but now you're not sure whether you can maintain the same level of friendship. You want to fire the relationship up again, but your out of tinder and it just rained. Well, that was me yesterday.

So, there's this girl...("a-ho!" an a "woot-woot!", comes from the self-satisfying crowd). First though, a little about me:

I'm 5'9"
150 lb when I skip breakfast and don't eat anything for a week an a 1/2
greenish-brownish-yellowish-ish eye/s
with a Romantic locked in my coin pocket
A professor once told me that two things come onto a guys mind when he first meets a person: 1) can I mate with them and 2) I can't remember this one.
This is basically true for me, but to take it a step further, I convince myslef that I am willing to make any sacrifices for that person whom I think I "love". This "love" though is often confused with another type of love, "friendship". I want to jump the gun, but the simple truth is, I would probably shoot myself! I am finding that I am inept (to put it more charitably, "inexperienced") at most relations. But, I'm improving (a pat, not too hard! though, on the back, a look of deep understanding and apathy (hate that word by the way) in your eyes but soon to look away, ground or feet.).

I done with that discussion, and I don't think I want to write about the girl right now. Still in a fluid mode, no real solid base. Time will tell.

Also, I am almost done with Lost in the Cosmos and I must say, IT NEEDS AN INDEX!!! The book is a marvel. It is really going to be a great joy to read through parts of the book years from now. And it is incredibly diverse, or I shoudl say Walker Pecy is. To cover all of the topics he does, I don't even know all of them, is just amazing. It is a treasure. Such great insights into human behaviour and I know that there are so many times his visuals will pop into my mind during really odd times. So if you see me staring out at something and snickering for no aparent reason it is probably because of him, or my own bent humor, either one.

I am now officially rambling.

Doug,

a) as you can see I copying people ideas, the listing thing
b) "If I die today please tell my wife I said, 'hello'." - roommate just quoting Futurama. He's interrupting me, sorry
c) I know I read a part in Lost/Cosmos about looking into another's eyes, but I can't find it (it's disappeared). If you or someone else knows, please tell me where it is.
d) Related to that, does Percy's write about transcendence as a result of self's engaging each other.
e) How does Percy define Immenance?, that which follows re-entry. Or does one ever fully re-enter and land? Are we continually in limbo, at various stages? Where the hell do you land? When did I take off?
f) What do you, or others, recommend I read next. By Percy or another. Remember I have a maliable mind and are prone to fits of artistic depression. So, please be kind.

1 Comments:

At 12:28 AM, Blogger Doug said...

Dan, in response to your list:

c) I don't recall the thing about looking in another's eyes, although I don't doubt it's in there. Are you asking for some personal reason? Did the words of Percy (wherever those words are) manifest themselves in your life?

d)Although I'm not entirely sure (sometimes I get the whole transcendence thing, other times I modify it for my own purposes, and sometimes I just throw "transcendence" into a sentence because it sounds good. As far as I can tell, transcendence according to Lost/Cosmos is always done alone: artists/writers/scientists transcend alone. The regular orbit of life is interpersonal. So selves engaging each other would be part of regular orbit I think. Sex, the ultimate act of interpersonal engagement, is one of the methods of re-entry. I think I confuse Transcendence with Elation. Of course, elation is always part of transcendence, but it's solitary elation...that's why we must re-orbit if we've transcended. But just because we feel elated, doesn't mean we've transcended. Does that make sense? Example: you're with a girl - it's amazing. The two of you stay out until 3 and there's something in her eyes that you can't get out of your head even when you're dreaming. You wake up the next morning elated. But you're still within the orbit of normal life. Second example: you make an incredible piece of art - the best thing you've ever done. You finish at 3 in the morning. You go to bed. The next morning you feel elated. But then, you realize you really have no one to share the feeling with. Others can appreciate it, but they haven't transcended with you, so you are alone in your elation...which is actually quite depressing. So you look for ways to reconnect with people - to reorbit. That's when you find the girl from example one...and I'll let you take it from there. Does that make any sense? That might be my own wrong interpretation. But I feel like that's what Percy is saying.

e) I don't quite get Percy's use of Immanence. I might have rushed through that part. As to the rest of those questions, I feel like my answer to them is hinted at in d), and to say any more would border on repetition.

f) I haven't read a ton of Percy...less than half. For fiction, I would recommend The Moviegoer. It's my favorite novel...well, maybe. He takes a lot from Kierkegaaard. I don't know Kierkegaard that well, so I've been trying to get into him. (Percy draws mostly from his early works. One in particular is called Repetition. i just started it today. It's pretty accessible, which is why I'm reading it and not The Sickness Unto Death.) And I've talked to a professor here about that novel so I know a bit more about it than I do about his other works.
Another Percy that I've just started is The Message in the Bottle. It's about human nature and the idea of language. How are they connected...Percy posits that if we could figure out language, we could develop a theory of man. I would highly recommend that book...even though I haven't finished it.

Other than that, i don't know what to say. What exactly are you looking for? Philosophical (fiction or nonfiction)? Good writing? Good stories? I really haven't read all that much compared to so many people, so I don't know if I'm much use. But I can try to direct you to something if you tell me what you might be looking for.


Okay, enough of that. I haven't had a chance to check out those websites, but I hope to soon. Right now, I'm exhausted from the week, and I want to sleep. Email me if you get a chance. Then we could toss around ideas there, where I feel less insecure. My address is Bakerdd1@gcc.edu.

Alright, see ya, Dan.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home